This study examined how home literacy environments might relate to rural kindergarten and first grade students’ reading performance. Home literacy activities and access to literacy materials were positively related to basic word reading skills, passage comprehension and spelling.

Authors: Ariel Tichnor-Wagner, Justin D. Garwood, Mary Bratsch-Hines & Lynne Vernon-Feagans

Source: Tichnor-Wagner, A., Garwood, J.D., Bratsch-Hines, M. & Vernon-Feagans, L. (2015). Home literacy environments and foundational literacy skills for struggling and nonstruggling readers in rural early elementary schools. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 31(1), 6–21, DOI: 10.1111/ldrp.12090

Factors such as weak early literacy skills and living in poverty may put young students at risk of reading disabilities. This study examined how home literacy environments might relate to rural kindergarten and first grade students’ reading performance. Parents of 1,108 kindergarten and first grade students in the rural Southeast United States completed questionnaires on the frequency of home literacy activities and access to literacy materials. Home literacy activities and access to literacy materials were positively related to basic word reading skills, passage comprehension and spelling.

• Research has found that factors such as weak early literacy skills and living in poverty may put young students at risk of reading disabilities.
• Good early reading instruction by classroom teachers in early elementary schools can be critical to helping many children learn how to read.
• Whitehurst and Lonigan (1998) conceptualised foundational reading skills that affect children’s later reading development in terms of two domains: 1) outside-in skills associated with reading comprehension, such as language, vocabulary, content and narrative understanding; and 2) inside-out skills focused on symbol/sound correspondences within words, such as word decoding, the alphabetic principle and phonemic awareness.
• Children’s home literacy environments have been found to influence both outside-in and inside-out language and literacy skills associated with later reading success.
• Poverty is the best predictor of children’s academic performance in school, including literacy development, and has been associated with weaker reading readiness in kindergarten and first grade.
• Rural children are exposed to many reading risk factors associated with geographic isolation, including limited access to libraries and other educational resources, the lower availability of high-quality preschool education and teachers who have fewer professional development opportunities, including less access to advanced degrees.

The study

In the current study, the types and frequency of literacy-related activities in the homes of rural kindergarten and first grade students were investigated, as well as the extent to which home literacy activities and access to literacy materials contributed to children’s outside-in and inside-out literacy skills.

Research questions

1. To what extent do rural families with children in kindergarten and first grade engage in literacy activities in their homes? Do differences exist between children who were identified as struggling and nonstruggling readers?
2. How do home literacy activities and access to literacy materials uniquely contribute to the basic word reading, reading comprehension and spelling scores of all students at the beginning of kindergarten or first grade, after controlling for demographic characteristics?

The data used in this study were drawn from a randomized controlled trial (RCT) prior to intervention implementation. The targeted reading intervention (TRI) was developed to help kindergarten and first grade struggling readers and their teachers in rural low-wealth schools by providing teachers with a weekly literacy coach, who used webcam technology to watch the teachers work with struggling readers and to give them real time feedback. Reading achievement data were available for 1,108 students (556 were struggling readers and 552 were nonstruggling readers).

Implications

• The results from the current study showed that rural families participated in a variety of literacy activities with their kindergarten and first grade children, and this was positively associated with outside-in (i.e. passage comprehension) and inside-out (i.e. letter identification, phonetic spelling) skills.
• Home literacy activities frequently took place in this sample of rural families.
• Considering that over half of the sample came from families with an annual income of less than $20,000, these findings combat negative stereotypes that cast low-income parents as being uninvolved with helping their children succeed in school.
• Rural kindergarten and first grade students had less access to print or digital reading materials when compared to national samples.
• Educators can provide parents with information to help children develop early literacy skills, including tips for how to help children with homework and engage their children in supplemental literacy activities.
• Teachers, for example, can provide details for parents on how to conduct storybook reading in ways that are aligned with school practices and that help build important early literacy skills (e.g. questions to ask to build comprehension, ways of pointing out aspects of the text to build print awareness, modelling fluency).
• Schools can ensure that they provide literacy resources to families with limited access; schools are an important avenue for providing access to computers and books.

Over two decades of Finnish research, children born with a risk of dyslexia were monitored in the Jyväskylä Longitudinal Study of Dyslexia (JLD). In total, 200 children, half of whom were considered to be at risk, were assessed from birth to puberty using hundreds of measures. The aims were to identify measures for predicting later reading difficulty and to instigate appropriate and early diagnosis and intervention.

Authors: Heikki Lyytinen, Jane Erskine, Jarmo Hämäläinen, Minna Torppa & Miia Ronimus

Source: Lyytinen, H., Erskine, J., Hämäläinen, J., Torppa, M. & Ronimus, M. (2015). Dyslexia – Early identification and prevention: Highlights from the Jyväskylä Longitudinal Study of Dyslexia. Curr Dev Disord Rep, 2, 330–338, DOI: 10.1007/s40474-015-0067-1

Over two decades of Finnish research, children born with a risk of dyslexia were monitored in the Jyväskylä Longitudinal Study of Dyslexia (JLD). In total, 200 children, half of whom were considered to be at risk, were assessed from birth to puberty using hundreds of measures. The aims were to identify measures for predicting later reading difficulty and to instigate appropriate and early diagnosis and intervention. At-risk children can be identified from newborn electroencephalographic brain recordings. The earliest easy-to-use predictive measure to identify children who need help in learning to read is letter knowledge. In response, a purpose-engineered computer game, GraphoGame (GG), provides an effective intervention tool. In doubling as a research instrument, GG provides bespoke intervention/reading instruction for typically/atypically developing children. GG is now crossing the developed and developing world to assist children, irrespective of the cause of their failing to learn to read.

• Since 1993, the JLD has followed, longitudinally from birth, a cohort of 200 Finnish children, half of whom are at familial risk of dyslexia.
• From the antenatal clinic to their upper school years, the JLD children have been assessed on a plethora of neuropsychological, neurophysiological, cognitive, behavioural and observational indices.
• By comparing the JLD children’s early developmental measures with their current developmental statuses, it is now possible to demonstrate those indices that are the most salient predictors of later difficulty in reading skills.
• This also allows a programme of intervention to target these salient areas of difficulty at the earliest possible time, using a remediation-based technology, GraphoGame (GG), which has been developed alongside the JLD study.

The impact of orthographic transparency

• Among alphabetic orthographies, Finnish is one of the most transparent.
• The transparency of a writing system refers to the consistency of links between sounds or phonemes in speech and the graphemes (letters, letter clusters) that represent them in text.
• Finnish children start school in August of the year that they turn seven years old.
• By this time, 45% can read, and the majority are at least familiar with most letter names.
• After a few months in school, most children can decode words and also pseudowords, because letter-by-letter decoding is not affected by the meaning of the word and differs from how decoding works, for example, in English.
• The disparity in the learning burden as a function of the transparency of the language is marked.
• Finnish children must learn to master the sounds of fewer than 30 letters/graphemes, and these can be relied upon to be perfectly consistent in their sound/written representation.
• In contrast, the much heavier burden of English, with its many-on-one permutations in the journey from sound to speech and back to sound, means that a child must master numerous context-dependent permutations from the outset.
• Due to the lighter burden of learning to decode accurately, dyslexia in transparent orthographies is typically characterised by difficulties with the fluency of decoding, rather than with simple accuracy.
• One of the few complexities of Finnish is that an audible increase in the duration of the phoneme in the pronunciation is marked by repeated or double letters – in short, the manipulation of phonemic length or quantity.
• This feature has been recognised as one key area of difficulty for the Finnish dyslexic, particularly in terms of spelling.

GraphoGame

• GraphoGame (GG) is a digital learning environment that has been developed to support at-risk children’s reading acquisition.
• The learning game, also comprising the training of basic mathematics skills, is used in schools and homes across Finland on a daily basis by thousands of children.
• Besides being an educational tool, GG is also a research instrument as it saves player logs, which can be used to analyse the learning processes of the players.
• In the game, the player hears a sound and matches it with the appropriate letter.
• The unique adaptive nature of the software ensures that the content of each trial is determined by the player’s performance in the previous trials, providing an optimal challenge level for each individual player.
• After the basic decoding skill is achieved, the training can continue with the fluency version of GG, which focuses on improving children’s reading speed by providing training in syllable recognition and the reading of sentences and longer texts.
• It is recommended that children who are at risk of reading difficulty and who will ultimately require more practice than their peers start to train with GG just before the beginning of formal schooling.

Conclusions

• The typical reader of transparent writing is able to quickly grasp the simple relationship between letters and sounds and assemble and manipulate these to form the words of the language and progress, with prolific reading and literacy experience, toward fluent reading with comprehension.
• Difficulty with the discrimination of complexity, such as phonemic length in Finnish, may hinder competence in letter-sound acquisition.
• Reading that lacks fluency is disrupted in nature and can never therefore become fully automatic.
• Unless automaticity is achieved, comprehension can never be fully achieved due to working memory limitations.
• It is therefore important for interventions to interrupt this potential impasse by quickly shifting the learner’s attention away from letter-sound drilling toward larger units.
• It should be acknowledged that there are a plethora of speech and language measures (e.g. phonological awareness (PA), rapid naming, the family literacy environment) that exert an influence on a child’s later difficulties.
• However, what is suggested is that close attention should be paid to those children who display delayed language and/or who may not be grasping the letters of the alphabet in line with expected developmental milestones.
• In the earlier years, the content of interventions could involve introductions to more meaningful larger units in whole word form. This would help stimulate an awareness of orthography and the accumulation of vocabulary.
• Once sufficient cognitive maturity is reached at school entry, learners may progress to the manipulation of the smaller most consistent units that are dependent on orthography in order to foster the precursors of reading acquisition.

A substantial proportion of children struggle to learn to read. This not only impairs their academic achievement but also increases their risk of social, emotional and mental health problems. The aim of this study is to outline some of the things that we have learned so far and to provide a framework for considering the causes of reading difficulties and the most effective ways to treat them.

Authors: Genevieve McArthur & Anne Castles

Source: McArthur, G. & Castles, A. (2017). Helping children with reading difficulties: Some things we have learned so far. NPJ Science of Learning, 2(7), DOI: 10.1038/s41539-017-0008-3

A substantial proportion of children struggle to learn to read. This not only impairs their academic achievement but also increases their risk of social, emotional and mental health problems. The aim of this study is to outline some of the things that we have learned so far and to provide a framework for considering the causes of reading difficulties and the most effective ways to treat them.

• Sixteen per cent of children struggle to learn to read to some extent, and five per cent of children have significant, severe and persistent problems.
• Poor reading is associated with an increased risk of school dropout, attempted suicide, incarceration, anxiety, depression and low self-concept.

Reading behaviours have different ‘proximal’ causes

• A proximal cause of a reading behaviour can be defined as a component of the cognitive system that directly and immediately produces that reading behaviour.
• Most reading behaviours will have more than one proximal cause.
• There are several theoretical and computational models of reading, which vary in some respects, but all include cognitive components that represent

1. the ability to recognise letters, letter clusters and written words;
2. the ability to recognise and produce speech sounds and spoken words;
3. the ability to access stored knowledge about the meanings of words and
4. links between these various components.

Reading behaviours have different ‘distal’ causes

• A distal cause has a distant, that is, an indirect or delayed, impact on a reading behaviour.
• Distal causes reflect the fact that reading is a taught skill that unfolds over time and through development.
• It depends upon a range of more cognitive abilities, such as memory, attention and language skills.
• Thus, there can be different causal pathways to the same impairment of the reading system.

Proximal intervention is more effective than distal intervention

• Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) are the gold standard method for assessing a treatment of any kind. Unfortunately, few interventions for reading difficulties have been tested with an RCT.
• Intervention can be divided into ‘proximal interventions’, which focus training on the proximal causes of a reading behaviour that are proposed to be part of the cognitive system for reading, and ‘distal interventions’, which focus on the distal causes of a reading behaviour.
• Only phonics training, which focuses on improving a proximal cause of poor reading (i.e. letter-sound mappings), has been shown to produce a statistically reliable effect.
• The ‘closer’ the intervention is to an impaired reading behaviour, the more likely it is to be effective.

Translating what we know (thus far) into evidence-based practice

• First, the fact that poor readers vary in the nature of their reading behaviours suggests that the first step in identifying an effective intervention for a poor reader is to assess different aspects of reading.
• Second, the fact that poor readers’ reading behaviours can have different proximal causes suggests that the next step is to test them for the potential proximal causes of their poor reading behaviours.
• Third, the fact that poor readers vary in the degree to which they experience comorbid cognitive and emotional impairments suggests that it would be useful to assess poor readers for their spoken language abilities, attention, anxiety, depression and self-concept, at the very least.
• Once a poor reader’s reading behaviours, proximal impairments and comorbid cognitive and emotional health problems have been identified, it should be possible to design an intervention that is a good match to their needs.

Sight word training led to significant gains in sight word reading measures, which were larger than gains made from phonics training; phonics training led to statistically significant gains in phonics reading measures, which were larger than gains made from sight word training; and both types of training led to significant gains in general reading that were similar in size. Training phonics before sight words had a slight advantage over the reverse order.

Authors: Genevieve McArthur, Anne Castles, Saskia Kohnen, Linda Larsen, Kristy Jones, Thushara Anandakumar & Erin Banales

Source: McArthur, G., Castles, A., Kohnen, S., Larsen, L., Jones, K., Anandakumar, T. & Banales, E. (2015). Sight word and phonics training in children with dyslexia. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 48(4), 391–407, DOI: 10.1177/0022219413504996

The aims of this study were to a) compare sight word training and phonics training in children with dyslexia and b) determine if different orders of sight word and phonics training have different effects on the reading skills of children with dyslexia. One group of children (n = 36) participated in 8 weeks of phonics training and then 8 weeks of sight word training, one group experienced the reverse (n = 36) and one group took part in phonics and sight word training simultaneously for two 8-week periods (n = 32). Sight word training led to significant gains in sight word reading measures, which were larger than gains made from phonics training; phonics training led to statistically significant gains in phonics reading measures, which were larger than gains made from sight word training; and both types of training led to significant gains in general reading that were similar in size. Training phonics before sight words had a slight advantage over the reverse order.

• Around 5% of children find it unusually difficult to learn to read even though they have had normal reading instruction, they have normal intelligence and they have no known neurological or psychological problems.
• To date, most treatment trials performed with children with dyslexia have looked at the effects of ‘phonics’ reading programmes.
• These programmes teach children to learn to read using the grapheme-phoneme correspondence (GPC) rules (i.e. ‘letter-sound rules’).
• In children with poor reading, phonics training had a moderate and significant effect on reading accuracy for ‘nonwords’ and ‘regular words’, and a small but significant effect on reading mixed words.
• When children first see the word CAT, they have to a) identify the letters, b) translate each grapheme into a speech sound and c) blend these phonemes together into a word that is spoken aloud.
• Once a word has been read a number of times via the phonics route, a memory is formed of the whole word.
• This memory activates the meaning of that word, the spoken representation of that word and the spoken output of that word.
• Together, these components form the ‘sight word’ or ‘lexical’ reading route of the dual route model of reading.
• Phonics reading plays an important role in the development of sight word reading.

The present study

This study had two aims: a) to compare sight word training and phonics training in children with dyslexia and b) to determine if different orders of sight word training and phonics training have different effects on the reading skills of children with dyslexia.

The hypotheses

1. Sight word training will lead to statistically significant gains in sight word reading measures, which will be larger than gains made from phonics training.
2. Phonics training will lead to statistically significant gains in phonics reading measures, which will be larger than gains made from sight word training.
3. Phonics training and sight word training will have similar-sized significant effects on measures of reading that will affect both phonics and sight word reading.

Study design

In Test 1, children aged between 7 and 12 years old completed the screening and outcome measures. After 8 weeks of no training, they returned to perform the outcome measures. The phonics + sight word group (n=36) then did 8 weeks of phonics training (and then Test 3) followed by 8 weeks of sight word training (and then Test 4). The sight word + phonics group (n=36) experienced the same except the order of training was reversed. The mixed + mixed group (n=32) participated in phonics and sight word training on alternate days for 8 weeks (and then Test 3) and then the same again for another 8 weeks (and then Test 4).

Interventions

Sight word training

• Children were asked to take part in five sight word training sessions per week for eight weeks.
• Each training session, which was designed to take 30 min, used one of 30 lists of 24 irregular words that increased in difficulty both between and within lists.
• The sight word training focused on reading accuracy rather than fluency.
• The training was done at home with the support of both a parent and a computer.

Phonics training

• Children and parents were instructed to perform the phonics training at home for 30 min per day, 5 days per week, for 8 weeks.
• All training was done on a computer.
• Training focused on accuracy rather than fluency.

Mixed training

• The mixed training was the same as the phonics and sight word training except that each type of training was performed on alternate days.

Summary

• Sight word training had a significant effect on trained and untrained irregular word reading, and in the case of trained irregular words, this effect was larger than the effect of phonics training.
• Phonics training had a significant effect on nonword reading accuracy and nonword reading fluency.
• These results suggest that it is important to explicitly teach phonics to children with dyslexia because these children appear to learn GPC rules more readily from phonics training than from exposure to sight words.
• Both sight word training and phonics training had significant effects on word reading fluency and reading comprehension.
• An unpredicted finding of this study was that sight word training, even when restricted to irregular words, can produce some benefits to reading via the phonics reading route, suggesting that phonics rules can be deduced implicitly from exposure to sight words to some extent.
• Training order had a significant effect on the untrained irregular word accuracy test.
• The group that experienced phonics training before sight word training saw significantly greater gains than the group who did sight word training and then phonics training.
• The superior effect of training phonics then sight words on untrained irregular words provides some support for the idea that phonics skills help children read unfamiliar words, even when those words are irregular.
• However, there appears to be no general disadvantage (or advantage) for training phonics and sight word reading simultaneously in children with dyslexia.

Implications

• These results, together with previous studies, suggest that relatively pure phonics training delivered via computers for up to 2 hr per week for less than 3 months has moderate to large effects on various reading skills, which reflect small yet reliable gains in children with dyslexia.
• The outcomes of this study support the idea that many children with dyslexia need more than just phonics training.
• Sight word training is particularly important for irregular words.
• Training children to read irregular words will not impair their ability to read via the letter-sound rules.

Maternal language was a significant predictor of storybook exposure but not of direct literacy instruction. Maternal language and phonological skills predicted children’s language and reading/spelling skills, respectively. Direct literacy instruction remained a predictor of children’s reading/spelling skills.

Authors: Marina L. Puglisi, Charles Hulme, Lorna G. Hamilton & Margaret J. Snowling

Source: Puglisi, M.L., Hulme, C., Hamilton, L.G. & Snowling, M.J. (2017). The home literacy environment is a correlate, but perhaps not a cause, of variations in children’s language and literacy development. Scientific Studies of Reading, 21(6), 498–514, DOI: 10.1080/10888438.2017.1346660

The present study investigated whether the home literacy environment predicts children’s reading and language skills once maternal language abilities are taken into account. Longitudinal data were collected during the preschool years for 251 children at high risk of dyslexia. Maternal language was a significant predictor of storybook exposure but not of direct literacy instruction. Maternal language and phonological skills predicted children’s language and reading/spelling skills, respectively. After accounting for variations in maternal language, storybook exposure was not a significant predictor of children’s outcomes. Direct literacy instruction remained a predictor of children’s reading/spelling skills.

• It is well established that the home literacy environment is an important predictor of children’s language and literacy development.
• The home literacy environment usually refers to activities undertaken by family members at home that relate to literacy learning as well as the literacy resources in the home and parental attitudes toward literacy.
• Home literacy environment activities may be formal or informal and active or passive.
• Genetic factors also have an important influence on literacy development.
• The heritability of reading and spelling is estimated to be .73 and .64, respectively, whereas shared environmental influences accounted for only 10% of the variance in reading.
• The correlation between the home literacy environment and children’s literacy skills may be genetically mediated.

The study

Hypotheses

• Measures of maternal language skills will predict the home literacy environment.
• Measures of the home literacy environment will predict children’s language and reading/spelling skills.
• Which measures of the home literacy environment will predict children’s outcomes after controlling for variations in mothers’ language and phonological skills?

The participants were 251 children from the Wellcome Project, and children who were at cognitive risk of developing reading problems later on were overrepresented.

Summary

• Maternal language skills were a significant predictor of storybook exposure but not direct literacy instruction.
• Storybook exposure predicted children’s general language and reading/spelling skills, whereas direct literacy instruction only predicted children’s reading/spelling skills.
• Once mothers’ language and phonological skills were taken into account, storybook exposure was no longer a predictor of children’s language or reading/spelling skills.
• Direct literacy instruction remained a predictor of children’s reading/spelling skills after accounting for variations in maternal language and phonological abilities.

Implications

• The findings suggest that the informal home literacy environment does not directly influence children’s language and reading development.
• The effects of the informal home literacy environment may rather reflect genetic influences; that is, mothers with good language skills pass on genes that confer good language skills. Storybook exposure correlated highly with both maternal language and SES, suggesting that maternal education, rather than maternal genes, is also a plausible driver of the effects.
• The effects of direct literacy instruction in the home on children’s early mastery of the mechanics of reading and spelling do appear to reflect environmental influences, although the influence is weak.
• The findings thus suggest that it is not solely the amount of literacy activity a child is exposed to that determines his or her early language and literacy development; it is also the linguistic ability of the parent who is providing the literacy environment at home.
• If the relationship between the informal home literacy environment and child language and reading/spelling outcomes reflects the effects of ge correlations, this does not mean that interventions to improve or enrich the home literacy environment will not be effective in promoting children’s language and reading development.

A crucial development is evident in understanding dyslexia, moving from its conceptualisation as a discrete identifiable condition toward the realisation of continuity with the general population with no clear boundaries and no qualitative differences. This conceptual evolution amounts to a transition from considering dyslexia to be some entity that causes poor reading toward considering the term dyslexia as simply labelling poor reading performance. This renders obsolete any searches for abnormalities and directs efforts toward understanding reading skill as a multifaceted domain following a complex multifactorial developmental course.

Author: Athanassions Protopapas

Source: Protopapas, A. (2019). Evolving concepts of dyslexia and their implications for research and remediation. Frontiers in Psychology, 10(2873), 1–10, DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02873

A crucial development is evident in understanding dyslexia, moving from its conceptualisation as a discrete identifiable condition toward the realisation of continuity with the general population with no clear boundaries and no qualitative differences. This conceptual evolution amounts to a transition from considering dyslexia to be some entity that causes poor reading toward considering the term dyslexia as simply labelling poor reading performance. This renders obsolete any searches for abnormalities and directs efforts toward understanding reading skill as a multifaceted domain following a complex multifactorial developmental course.

Why define dyslexia?

• Once we know exactly what something is and is not, we can construct a definition that distils our understanding into a clear, concise statement of who belongs to the category and who does not.
• With regard to research, we need to know how to form our research groups.
• A definition also dictates what we should measure to document group inclusion and to examine the features of the classification.
• In education, we need to know which children are selected for remedial services, a decision of the utmost importance given that poor literacy is associated with poor academic, social, behavioural, emotional, professional, financial and health outcomes.
• The definition also directs our assessment and educational programmes, by highlighting what needs to be assessed to justify the selection, to document the relevant educational needs and also to guide the setting of specific objectives to be achieved by remedial education.

Elements of dyslexia definitions

• Dyslexia is seen as a difficulty or inability regarding learning to read in a situation where success was expected.
• The first element contributing to expectation is age and experience.
• A second element concerns limitations arising from sensory perception.
• A third element concerns educational opportunity.
• Finally, general cognitive ability is an element commonly seen as related to expectations in terms of reading competence.

Implications

• Research should stop trying to answer the question ‘what causes dyslexia?’ and instead put more effort into understanding the observed range of reading development trajectories and the extent to which different factors affect learning to read at different ages and in distinct genetic and environmental contexts and instructional situations.
• A wider cognitive and learning profile may be necessary for the special educator or educational psychologist to identify the weak and strong areas for any given child, because the individualised educational plan will have to be based on strengths and build on these to address weaknesses.
• So, the specialist will consider and may have to support the development of phonological processing, phonological memory, phonological awareness, a knowledge of the alphabet and conventions of print, before reading itself can be addressed.

Multilevel analyses of a survey of 43,870 pupils (with an average age of 10) in Western European regions reveal a positive relation between early parental involvement in literacy activities and an increasing level of reading literacy and parental education. Students with a lower socioeconomic status (SES) also have lower reading literacy and reading attitudes than students with a higher SES. Children with a lower SES experience later parental involvement in literacy activities than children with a higher SES.

Authors: Kenneth Hemmerechts, Orhan Arigdag & Dimokritos Kavadias

Source: Hemmerechts, K.; Agirdag, O. & Kavadias, D. (2017) The relationship between parental literacy involvement, socio-economic status and reading literacy. Educational Review, 69(1), 85–101, DOI: 10.1080/00131911.2016.1164667

This study explored the relationship between parental literacy activities with the child, SES and reading literacy. Multilevel analyses of a survey of 43,870 pupils (with an average age of 10) in Western European regions reveal a positive relation between early parental involvement in literacy activities and an increasing level of reading literacy and parental education. Students with a lower SES also have lower reading literacy and reading attitudes than students with a higher SES. Children with a lower SES experience later parental involvement in literacy activities than children with a higher SES.

• The socialisation process through which children begin to learn different ideas and skills and develop an identity is important.
• The socialisation process is initiated during early childhood in the family environment and continues into the school environment.
• Literacy activity is a specific from of this socialisation relevant to children’s academic development.
• We expect that parents with a higher SES tend to spend more time instilling skills and attitudes before primary school begins, which then helps children to be more successful in school later on.
• We expect that early parental literacy involvement is related to pupils’ reading literacy skills and attitudes toward reading.
• The primary habitus of children with a higher SES might be better suited to the primary school environment, and thus their parents have to interfere less in reading literacy during primary school.

The study

Hypotheses

• Early parental literacy involvement at home (before primary school) is positively related to SES.
• Attitudes toward reading (in primary school) are positively related to SES and early literacy involvement.
• Early parental literacy involvement is positively related to reading literacy.
• Late parental literacy involvement at home (in primary school) is negatively related to SES.
• Late parental literacy involvement is related to the reading literacy of children: it is more likely when children have poor reading literacy and less likely when children have good reading literacy.
• The transition of a low early parental literacy involvement to a high late parental involvement is more likely for children with a lower SES.

Participants were 43,870 pupils from Western European countries with an average age of 10.3 years old. The early literacy activities that the parents were asked about included reading books, telling stories and singing songs. Late parental literacy involvement included helping the child with reading for school. Children also did a reading literacy test, and their attitudes toward reading were measured.

Summary

• There was a positive relation between early involvement in literacy activities (before primary school) and reading literacy at the age of 10 years old and parental education.
• Children from a family with a low SES experience the late type of involvement in literacy activities more than children with a high SES.
• Positive attitudes toward reading are more likely for children in families with a higher SES and who experience a high level of early literacy involvement.
• Late parental literacy involvement is more likely when children have poor reading literacy.
• Those children who experience more late than early involvement have lower reading literacy.

This study examined the cross-lagged relations between reading and spelling in five alphabetic orthographies varying in consistency (English, French, Dutch, German, Greek). The relations across languages were unidirectional: earlier reading predicted subsequent spelling. Also, significant differences between languages in terms of the strength of the effects of earlier reading on subsequent spelling were found.

Authors: George K. Georgiou, Karin Landerl, George Manolitsis, Minna Torppa, Alain Desrochers, Peter F. de Jong & Rauno Parrila

Source: Georgiou, G.K., Landerl, K., Manolitsis, G., Torppa, M., Desrochers, A., de Jong, P.F. & Parrila, R. (2020). Reading and spelling development across languages varying in orthographic consistency: Do their paths cross? Child Development, 91(2), e266-e279, DOI: 10.1111/cdev.13218

This study examined the cross-lagged relations between reading and spelling in five alphabetic orthographies varying in consistency (English, French, Dutch, German, Greek). Nine hundred and forty-one children were followed from grade 1 to grade 2 and were tested on word and pseudoword reading fluency and on spelling to dictation. The relations across languages were unidirectional: earlier reading predicted subsequent spelling. Also, significant differences between languages in terms of the strength of the effects of earlier reading on subsequent spelling were found.

• There is little doubt that reading and spelling are interrelated skills relying on similar linguistic skills, such as letter knowledge, phonological awareness, orthographic knowledge and morphological awareness.
• However, the direction of impact and whether the direction changes over time is not known.
• The purpose of this study was to examine the cross-lagged relations between reading and spelling in five languages varying in orthographic consistency (English, French, Dutch, German and Greek).

The study

The present study examines the cross-lagged relations between reading and spelling from the end of grade 1 to the end of grade 2 across a wide range of alphabetic orthographies that were purposefully selected to vary in consistency.

Research questions

• How is the development of children’s reading ability associated with that of spelling?
• Does orthographic consistency influence the relations between reading and spelling?

The participants were 941 children who were followed from the end of grade 1 until the end of grade 2. English speaking (n = 170) and French speaking (n = 254) children from Canada, 113 Dutch speakers from the Netherlands, 175 German speakers from Austria and 229 Greek speakers from Greece were recruited.

Implications

• The results support Frith’s hypothesis that there are unidirectional relations between reading and spelling, and that reading skills predict later spelling skills.
• This suggests that, at least among alphabetic orthographies and once children have mastered some basic decoding skills, any differences between languages do not impact the direction of the effects but may impact the strength of the effects.
• The findings suggest that orthographic learning at this point in literacy development is driven by implicit learning from decoding and exposure, rather than by explicit learning from spelling.

The present meta-analysis extracts the results of all the available randomised controlled trials. The results revealed that phonics instruction is not only the most frequently investigated treatment approach but also the only approach whose efficacy on reading and spelling performance in children and adolescents with reading disabilities is statistically confirmed.

Authors: Katharina Galuschka, Elena Ise, Kathrin Krick & Gerd Schulte-Körne

Source: Galuschka, K., Ise, E., Krick, K. & Schulte-Körne, G. (2014). Effectiveness of treatment approaches for children and adolescents with reading disabilities: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. PloS ONE, 9(2), e89900, DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0089900

Children and adolescents with reading disabilities experience a significant impairment in terms of the acquisition of reading and spelling skills. The present meta-analysis extracts the results of all available randomised controlled trials. The aim was to determine the effectiveness of different treatment approaches and the impact of various factors on the efficacy of interventions. Twenty-two randomised controlled trials with a total of forty-nine comparisons of experimental and control groups were included. The results revealed that phonics instruction is not only the most frequently investigated treatment approach but also the only approach whose efficacy on reading and spelling performance in children and adolescents with reading disabilities is statistically confirmed.

• Children, adolescents and adults with reading disabilities (dyslexia) experience a significant impairment with regard to the acquisition of reading accuracy, reading fluency, reading comprehension and spelling skills, which cannot be accounted for by low IQs, visual acuity problems, neurological damage or poor educational opportunities.
• Reading disability has a genetic basis, and the underlying neurobiological and cognitive causes are largely debated.
• A large number of interventions and therapies, derived from various treatment approaches, have been constructed and evaluated.
• The National Reading Panel’s (NRP) review found that systematic instruction in learning letter sound relations and in blending sounds to form words is most effective for improving reading and spelling skills in disabled readers.

The present study

The present meta-analysis has two advantages over previously published work. First, due to the inclusion of exclusively randomised controlled trials (RCTs), the observed effect sizes can most likely be attributed to the intervention. Second, because all the available RCTs are integrated, it is possible to compare the effectiveness of different treatment approaches.

Goals

1. The first aim is to determine the efficacy of different treatment approaches on the reading and spelling performance of reading-disabled children and adolescents.
2. The second aim is to explore the impact of various factors on the efficacy of these treatment approaches.

The present meta-analysis consisted of 22 RCTs. There were 1,138 participants in the experimental groups and 764 participants in the control groups. Treatment approaches were classified into distinct categories based on the description of the intervention in the report, such as phonemic awareness instruction, which included interventions that foster the ability to recognise and manipulate phonemes in words. Another example category was phonics instruction, which systematically teaches letter-sound correspondences and decoding strategies that involve blending or segmenting individual letters or phonemes or dividing a spoken or written word into syllables or onsets and rimes.

Summary

• The results revealed that phonics instruction is the most intensively investigated treatment approach, and it is the only approach whose effectiveness on reading and spelling performance in children and adolescents with reading disabilities is statistically confirmed.
• Thus, the systematic instruction of letter-sound correspondences and decoding strategies, and the application of these skills in reading and writing activities, is the most effective method for improving the literacy skills of children and adolescents with reading disabilities.
• Phonics instruction combines elements of reading fluency training and phonemic awareness training, but neither one alone is sufficient to achieve substantial improvements.

This study examined the role of family in children’s acquisition of early reading skills. Participants were 72 grade 1 learners and their parents from low-income Zambian families. Parental reading attitudes and the family literacy environment significantly predicted early reading skills, thus family is an important element in children’s processes of learning to read.

Authors: Tamara Chansa-Kabali & Jari Westerholm

Source: Chansa-Kabali, T. & Westerholm, J. (2014). The role of family on pathways to acquiring early reading skills in Lusaka’s low-income communities. An Interdisciplinary Journal on Humans in ICT Environments, 10(1), 5–21.

This study examined the role of family in children’s acquisition of early reading skills. Participants were 72 grade 1 learners and their parents from low-income Zambian families. Parental reading attitudes and the family literacy environment significantly predicted early reading skills, thus family is an important element in children’s processes of learning to read.

• The learning process of reading starts long before the child starts school.
• Parent-child interactions affect the transfer of skills from parents to children as they socialise within their families.
• In the formal process of learning to read, decoding is a paramount skill.
• Most first graders in Zambia do not achieve the mastery of reading skills by the end of that year.
• In schools, challenges include poorly resourced infrastructures, inadequate reading materials, large class sizes and low teacher motivation.
• Within the family, the lack of children’s books and parents’ levels of education, employment statuses and reading attitudes can compromise reading attainment.

The study

This study examined the home environment as a predictor of reading development. Because reading is a mechanism through which children come to understand their environments, this study aimed at identifying family factors that affect children’s orthographic awareness and decoding competence, which are skills pertinent to reading development.

Research question

• What family factors significantly explain variation in children’s early reading skills?

The participants were 72 learners who were randomly selected from 9 schools in Lusaka, Zambia and their primary caregivers.

Measures for reading skills

Orthographic awareness

• Children were asked to choose items that would help them to read. They were shown letters, syllables and simple words from the ciNyanja writing system, as well as non-ciNyanja letters, syllables and words, which served as distractors.

Decoding competence

• Children were asked to match the sound that they heard to the corresponding letter, syllable or word on the paper.

Measures for family environment

Parental reading attitude

• This was assessed through a modified version of the Home Literacy Questionnaire, consisting of ten items, such as “I spend my spare time reading” and “I find reading boring”.

Family literacy environment

• This was assessed with the Home Literacy Questionnaire and included information on socioeconomic status and family possessions, such as televisions, electricity and reading materials.
• There were also questions on the presence and frequency of exposure to print, oral language and reading and writing activities was asked.

Implications

• Family variables explain substantial variation in the reading outcomes in both pre-tests and post-tests but are less influential in terms of explaining the gain scores.
• The family variables studied explained a total of 53% of the variance in orthographic awareness in the pre-test, but that decreased to 24% for the gain scores. And similarly, these figures were 44% in the pre-test and 19% in the post-test for the variance in decoding competence.
• Some parents also asked their children to teach them what they had learned in school and, for example, to tell them what a television programme was about. These kinds of activities may also facilitate children’s language skills.