This study examined how home literacy environments might relate to rural kindergarten and first grade students’ reading performance. Home literacy activities and access to literacy materials were positively related to basic word reading skills, passage comprehension and spelling.
Authors: Ariel Tichnor-Wagner, Justin D. Garwood, Mary Bratsch-Hines & Lynne Vernon-Feagans
Source: Tichnor-Wagner, A., Garwood, J.D., Bratsch-Hines, M. & Vernon-Feagans, L. (2015). Home literacy environments and foundational literacy skills for struggling and nonstruggling readers in rural early elementary schools. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 31(1), 6–21, DOI: 10.1111/ldrp.12090
Factors such as weak early literacy skills and living in poverty may put young students at risk of reading disabilities. This study examined how home literacy environments might relate to rural kindergarten and first grade students’ reading performance. Parents of 1,108 kindergarten and first grade students in the rural Southeast United States completed questionnaires on the frequency of home literacy activities and access to literacy materials. Home literacy activities and access to literacy materials were positively related to basic word reading skills, passage comprehension and spelling.
Literacy activities and materials in the home
The study
In the current study, the types and frequency of literacy-related activities in the homes of rural kindergarten and first grade students were investigated, as well as the extent to which home literacy activities and access to literacy materials contributed to children’s outside-in and inside-out literacy skills.
Research questions
The data used in this study were drawn from a randomized controlled trial (RCT) prior to intervention implementation. The targeted reading intervention (TRI) was developed to help kindergarten and first grade struggling readers and their teachers in rural low-wealth schools by providing teachers with a weekly literacy coach, who used webcam technology to watch the teachers work with struggling readers and to give them real time feedback. Reading achievement data were available for 1,108 students (556 were struggling readers and 552 were nonstruggling readers).
Findings
Implications